How to prove that under Lorentz transformation, the volume element cdtdxdydz is invariant, i.e., prove that cdt0dx0dy0dz0 = cdtdxcydz - Quora
![special relativity - A confusion in the Derivation of Lorentz Transformation - Physics Stack Exchange special relativity - A confusion in the Derivation of Lorentz Transformation - Physics Stack Exchange](https://i.stack.imgur.com/7xqyI.png)
special relativity - A confusion in the Derivation of Lorentz Transformation - Physics Stack Exchange
![800. [T. 1. a.] Simple Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation | The Mathematical Gazette | Cambridge Core 800. [T. 1. a.] Simple Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation | The Mathematical Gazette | Cambridge Core](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0025557200247293/resource/name/firstPage-S0025557200247293a.jpg)
800. [T. 1. a.] Simple Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation | The Mathematical Gazette | Cambridge Core
![∇ₖPascal ∇ₚKwanten (∛) (Πασκάλ) on Twitter: "Derivation of the Lorentz transformations from the invariance of the line element ds^2=dx^2-c^2dt^2 and the condition that x'=0, x=vt Derivation of the relativistic addition/substraction of velocities ∇ₖPascal ∇ₚKwanten (∛) (Πασκάλ) on Twitter: "Derivation of the Lorentz transformations from the invariance of the line element ds^2=dx^2-c^2dt^2 and the condition that x'=0, x=vt Derivation of the relativistic addition/substraction of velocities](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EWm6ehfXgAAUHfa.jpg:large)